WORKCLAVE VS GREYTHR

Attendance intelligence. Not just a payroll checkbox.

GreytHR runs payroll well. But attendance in GreytHR is a compliance module - it tells you if someone showed up, not what they worked on. For project-based teams, that's not enough.

FeatureWorkclaveGreytHR
Session-based tracking
Links time to projects, not just presence
Full session intelligence
Payroll-first, no sessions
Approval workflows
Manager reviews before sessions close
Built-in, one-click approval
No approval flow
AI session analytics
Automated insights on utilisation and billing
Powered by LLM, auto-generated
Basic reports only
Pricing & minimums
What you pay before adding your first user
₹0 to start. ₹199/user. No floor.
₹70–150/user, dated UX

What a team actually pays: Workclave vs GreytHR

GreytHR prices per employee per month but bills against minimum employee blocks per plan, so small teams pay for seats they do not fill. Attendance features sit in the mid and upper plans.

Team sizeWorkclaveGreytHR
10-person team₹1,990/mo (₹199 × 10)≈ ₹3,000–3,500/mo (min-block billing)
20-person team₹3,980/mo (₹199 × 20)≈ ₹3,000–3,500/mo (min-block billing)
50-person team₹9,950/mo (₹199 × 50)≈ ₹3,500–7,500/mo (plan-dependent)

Workclave: free up to 5 users, then ₹199/user/month with no base fee. Competitor pricing is approximate, as of July 2026 — always confirm current pricing on the vendor's own page. GreytHR plans are billed against minimum employee counts (typically 25–50) with per-employee rates of roughly ₹60–150 for plans that include attendance — small teams pay the block minimum either way. Source: greythr.com/pricing · Full breakdown: GreytHR pricing explained

An honest read on GreytHR

WHERE GREYTHR IS GENUINELY STRONG
  • Proven Indian payroll and statutory compliance engine (PF, ESI, PT, TDS filings)
  • Long operating history and a very large SME customer base in India
  • Leave and attendance policies map well to traditional shift-based organisations
  • Low per-employee price at larger headcounts
WHERE GREYTHR FALLS SHORT FOR PROJECT TEAMS
  • Attendance is a payroll input — no project or client context anywhere in the record
  • No manager approval workflow between attendance and billing
  • Minimum-block billing makes small teams overpay per head
  • Interface and workflows feel dated next to modern tools — a frequent review-site complaint

Migrating from GreytHR to Workclave

Most teams complete the switch inside one billing cycle. No hardware, no implementation project.

  1. 1
    Export the employee master from GreytHR

    Standard CSV export. Only names and emails are needed to invite people to Workclave.

  2. 2
    Set up projects and clients in Workclave

    This is the piece GreytHR never had: the project list your sessions will attach to.

  3. 3
    Choose check-in modes per team

    Self check-in for desk teams, manager-marked attendance for field or support staff — both are built in.

  4. 4
    Parallel-run one payroll cycle

    Compare Workclave's attendance register export against GreytHR's register at month end. They should match — with Workclave's adding project context.

  5. 5
    Feed payroll from Workclave exports

    Keep GreytHR for payroll processing if you like it, or drop to a payroll-only arrangement — attendance and billing now come from Workclave.

What teams say when they switch from GreytHR

Services Firm · 27 people · Chennai
THE PROBLEM THEY HAD

Their team said GreytHR attendance felt like it was designed in 2008. Clock status was available, but no project context existed in daily workflow.

AFTER SWITCHING TO WORKCLAVE

Workclave introduced project-linked sessions and approval controls in a modern interface that team leads actually used daily.

Digital Product Team · 14 people · Bangalore
THE PROBLEM THEY HAD

They maintained a separate Excel workbook for billing because GreytHR attendance reports could not map hours to client workstreams.

AFTER SWITCHING TO WORKCLAVE

After moving, billing sheets were replaced by session exports already tied to project codes and approval history.

Workclave vs GreytHR: common questions

Is Workclave a good GreytHR alternative?

For attendance and time tracking in project-based teams, yes. Workclave records project-linked, manager-approved sessions instead of punch-clock presence, and has no minimum employee billing (₹199/user/month, free up to 5 users). GreytHR remains a solid choice for payroll processing itself.

Can I keep GreytHR for payroll and use Workclave for attendance?

Yes — this is a common setup. Workclave's attendance register and approved-session exports feed the payroll input, while GreytHR (or any payroll service) handles statutory processing.

How does GreytHR's pricing compare for a 10-person team?

As of July 2026, GreytHR bills against minimum employee blocks, so a 10-person team typically pays for a 25–50 employee block — roughly ₹3,000–3,500/month for plans with attendance. Workclave charges exactly ₹1,990/month for 10 users, and ₹0 for teams of 5 or fewer.

Does GreytHR track which project people work on?

No. GreytHR attendance is a payroll compliance record: present, absent, leave, overtime. It has no concept of projects or clients. In Workclave the project is chosen when the session starts.

How long does switching from GreytHR take?

Setup is typically a day; most teams parallel-run one payroll cycle before switching their attendance source of truth to Workclave.

Ready to make the switch?